A descriptive study of Cephalic and prosopic anthropometric indices in one-day-old infants in Imam Ali and Kamali Hospital, Karaj

Authors

  • Fatemeh Kermanian Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
  • Marzieh Tavakol Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
  • Nasim Beiranvand School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
  • Simin Mahakizadeh Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v8i3.1225

Keywords:

Anthropometry, Cephalic index, Prosopic index, Craniofacial, Newborn

Abstract

Objective: There is no published literature about the types of head and face shapes in the Alborz newborns. Therefore, we designed this study to report these important regional data.

Methods: Head length, head width, face length, face width, prosopic and cephalic indices were made on 150 newborns (75 males and 75 females) with a view to establish the criterion of cephalometry for this age group in Iran. A special emphasis was given to delivery mode in this study.

Results: There was no significant difference in cephalic and prosopic indices between two groups (female: p=0.46; male: p=0.43). Brachycephalic type was dominant and dolicocephalic type was rare in male and female neonates. There was no significant difference in head shape between two groups. Hypereuriprosopic and hyperleptoprosopic were dominant and rare types, respectively, in newborns without significant difference between two groups.

Conclusion: The head and face indices in the newborn infants born by cesarean section were not significantly different from vaginal delivery group. However, the role of nutrition and climate could not be ruled out.

References

Samadi-Afshar S. Comparison of Growth Index in Exclusive Breastfeeding and Infant Formula Feeding in Six-Month-Old Infants in East Azerbaijan Province. Depiction of Health. 2018;8(4):252-9.

Mahakizadeh S, Moghani-Ghoroghi F, Moshkdanian G, Mokhtari T, Hassanzadeh G. The determination of correlation between stature and upper limb and hand measurements in Iranian adults. Forensic science international. 2016;260:27-30.

Williams P, Dyson M, Dussak J. Bannister. LH; Berry, MM; Collins, P. & Fergson, MWJ Gray's Anatomy. Skeletal system 38th Ed Elbs with Churchill Livingston London. 1995:607-12.

Azizi M, Hassanzadeh G, Barbarestani M, Sadr M, Dehbashipour A, Alaghbandha N, et al. Comparative Anthropometric Analysis of Facial Dimensions and Types in Qazvin, Iran and DeraGhazi Khan, Pakistan. Anatomical Sciences Journal. 2014;11(3):119-26.

Gholamreza H, Makan S, Noushin A, Ali D, Mohammad Abrar A, Omran Heydar Z. Anthropometric characteristics of craniums in residents of Qazvin, Iran and Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan: a comparative study. 2013.

Kawasaki Y, Yoshida T, Matsui M, Hiraiwa A, Inomata S, Tamura K, et al. Clinical Factors That Affect the Relationship between Head Circumference and Brain Volume in Very‐Low‐Birth‐Weight Infants. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2019;29(1):104-10.

Šimič Klarić A, Tomić Rajić M, Tesari Crnković H. Timing of head circumference measurement in newborns. Clinical pediatrics. 2014;53(5):456-9.

Ghosh A, Sinha P. An economised craniofacial identification system. Forensic Science International. 2001;117(1-2):109-19.

Hackman DA, Farah MJ, Meaney MJ. Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature reviews neuroscience. 2010;11(9):651-9.

Golalipour M, Jahanshahi M, Haidari K. The variation of head and face shapes in female newborns in the South-East of the Caspian Sea (Iran-Gorgan). European Journal of Anatomy. 2021;9(2):95-8.

Jordaan H. Neonatal and maternal cranial form. South African Medical Journal. 1976;50(52):2064-8.

Mibodi I, Frahani M. Study of normal range of anatomical dimensions of one-day old newborn by cephalometry. Journal of Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran. 1996;14(1):1-8.

Eivazi S, Mastery Farahani R. The cephalometric neurocranial index of one-day-old male newborns in Kermanshah by anthropometry. Anatomical Sciences Journal. 2013;10(1):51-6.

Heidari Z, Mohammadi M, SMH NM, Arab AJTUMJTP. Cephalic and prosopic indices: comparison in one-day newborn boys in Zahedan. 2004;62(2):156-65.

Bayat PD, Ghanbari AJEJoA. The evaluation of craniofacial dimensions in female Arak newborns (central Iran) in comparison with other Iranian racial subgroups. 2019;13(2):77-82.

Golalipour M, Hosseinpour KJEJoA. Estimation of the cranial capacity and brain weight of Iranian female newborns. 2021;10(2):49-52.

Jahanshahi M, Golalipour M, Heidari K. The effect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran. Singapore medical journal. 2008;49(11):940-3.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-26

How to Cite

Kermanian, F. ., Tavakol, M. ., Beiranvand, N. ., & Mahakizadeh, S. . (2022). A descriptive study of Cephalic and prosopic anthropometric indices in one-day-old infants in Imam Ali and Kamali Hospital, Karaj. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v8i3.1225

Most read articles by the same author(s)