Explaining the conceptual considerations of virtual university in medical education: a systematic review


  • Soleiman Ahmady Department of Medical Education, Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Amin Habibi Department of Medical Education, Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Zohreh Koshgoftar Department of Medical Education, Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.




Virtual university, Medical education, Systematic review, Models


Aim: Most of existing literature on the concept of virtual university of medical sciences have been collected in a non-systematic manner. This issue highlights the need to conduct research on virtual university-related topics through systematic research evidence and empirical evaluations. The aim of the present study is to investigate the real complexity and diversity of the concept of virtual university of medical sciences.

Method: This was a systematic review with the BeHEMoTH approach and aimed to identify, review, analyze and integrate models, theories and frameworks related to the concept of virtual university of medical sciences. Eligible articles were searched in PubMed, ERIC, IEEE، ISI ،Scopus, Ecampus research unit from 2001 to 2022 using related keywords in three stages.

Results: A total of 13 articles were finally identified according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pedagogical, technology, managerial, educational design, technology implementation, and educational-administrative management components were referred to in 5, 5, 4, 7, 6 and 4 articles, respectively. Thematic analysis of the models was carried out in two theoretical dimensions (pedagogical component, managerial component and technological component) and operational dimension (educational design, administrative-educational management and technology implementation).

Conclusion: The results of the present study emphasize the need to pay attention to these six components in the establishment and development of virtual universities of medical sciences. In order to improve the education process in virtual universities, the process quality evaluation framework can be used.


Barnett R. Realizing the University (London, Institute of Education, University of London). Blake, R. Smith, and P. Standish (1998) The Universities We Need: Higher Education After Dearing. 1997.

Anderson M. Virtual universities: Future implications for students and academics. In16th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved September 1999 (Vol. 17, p. 2003).

Robins K, Webster F, editors. The virtual university? knowledge, markets, and management. Oxford University Press; 2002 Nov 7.

Rada R. Understanding virtual universities. Intellect Books; 2001.

Ahmad R, Piccoli G. Virtual learning environments: An information technology basic skills course on the Web

Harasim LM, Hiltz SR, Teles L, Turoff M. Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. MIT press; 1995.

Leidner DE, Jarvenpaa SL. The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS quarterly. 1995 Sep 1:265-91.

Anastasiades PS. Virtual universities: A critical approach. InInternational Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 Dec 3 (pp. 1170-1171). IEEE.

Dabous FT, Rabhi FA, Ray PK, Benatallah B. Middleware technologies for b2b integration. Annual Review of Communications. 2003 Nov;56(3).

Slaughter S, Leslie LL. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university.

Cornford J. The virtual university is... the university made concrete? Information, Communication & Society. 2000 Jan 1;3(4):508-25

Hean S, O’Halloran C, Pitt R, Green C, Temple J. A systematic review of the contribution of theory to the development and delivery of effective interprofessional curricula in health professional education. Hentet fra https://www. bemecollaboration. org/downloads/1243/HEAN_Protocol_DEC2012. pdf. 2013.

Booth A, Harris J, Croot E, Springett J, Campbell F, Wilkins E. Towards a methodology for cluster searching to provide conceptual and contextual “richness” for systematic reviews of complex interventions: case study (CLUSTER). BMC medical research methodology. 2013 Dec;13(1):1-4.

Votruba N, Ziemann A, Grant J, Thornicroft G. A systematic review of frameworks for the interrelationships of mental health evidence and policy in low-and middle-income countries. Health research policy and systems. 2018 Dec;16(1):1-7.

Campbell M, Egan M, Lorenc T, Bond L, Popham F, Fenton C, Benzeval M. Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health. Systematic reviews. 2014 Dec;3(1):1-1.

Pedagogical perspectives, inspirational horizons in the higher education curriculum. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies.; 10 (19): 171-93.

Méndez JB. The Virtual Health University: An eLearning Model within the Cuban Health System. MEDICC review. 2008 Mar 28;10(1):22-8.

Ivanova G, Smrikarov A. Methodology for design of virtual learning environments–virtual universities. InE-learning II Conference, Berlin, Germany 2005.

Conole G, Wills G, Carr L, Vadcard L, Hall W, Grange SS. Building a virtual university for orthopaedics. InEdMedia+ Innovate Learning 2003 (pp. 22-27). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Abdollahi D. A study of pedagogical aspects of a virtual university. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Researches. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):12.

Mbam BC, Odachi GN. Modelling of web-based virtual university administration for Nigerian universities. AFRREV STECH: An International Journal of Science and Technology. 2014 Jul 3;3(2):86-107.

Cecil J, Gupta A, Pirela-Cruz M, Ramanathan P. An IoMT based cyber training framework for orthopedic surgery using Next Generation Internet technologies. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2018 Jan 1; 12:128-37.

Fallon C, Brown S. E-learning standards: a guide to purchasing, developing, and deploying standards-conformant e-learning. CRC Press; 2002 Nov 25.

Van Drie JH, Lajiness MS. Approaches to virtual library design. Drug Discovery Today. 1998 Jun 1;3(6):274-83.

Mackey TK, Shah N, Miyachi K, Short J, Clauson K. A framework proposal for blockchain-based scientific publishing using shared governance. Frontiers in Blockchain. 2019 Nov 15; 2:19.

Gupta SS. Blockchain. IBM Onlone (http://www. IBM. COM). 2017.

Flores RR, Vértiz-Osores RI, Ochoa GL, Romero AA. Virtual university education in the context of the health emergency due to COVID-19: Challenges in the evaluation processes. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education (INT-JECSE). 2020;12(1):467-77.

Shahtalebi S, Shatalebi B, Shatalebi F. A strategic model of virtual university. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011 Jan 1; 28:909-13.

Bradley C, Oliver M. The evolution of pedagogic models for work-based learning within a virtual university. Computers & Education. 2002 Jan 1;38(1-3):37-52.

Khayal IS, Farid AM. A dynamic model for a cyber-physical healthcare delivery system with human agents. In2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2017 Oct 5 (pp. 3624-3629). IEEE.



How to Cite

Ahmady, S., Habibi, A., & Koshgoftar, Z. . (2022). Explaining the conceptual considerations of virtual university in medical education: a systematic review. Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v8i5.1253