Comparison between Gingival Pyogenic Granuloma and Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma by Immunohistochemical Detection of CD34 and Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v5i3.611Keywords:
Pyogenic granuloma, , Peripheral giant cell granuloma, CD34, α-SMAAbstract
Objectives: The aim of the present research was to study the clinical and the immunohistochemical expressions of CD34 and alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) for gingival pyogenic granuloma in comparison with peripheral giant cell granuloma.
Methods: Formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens of (48) gingival pyogenic granuloma and (39) peripheral giant cell granuloma were used in the study. Immunohistochemical analysis for CD34 and α-SMA were studied in PG and PGCG.
Results: The mean numbers of the CD34 positive micro vessels in PGs and PGCGs were 32.58± 17.778 and 22.4±11.208 respectively. Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference present between them (P<0.01).The mean numbers of blood vessels with vascular surrounding cells non-reactive to α-SMA in PGs and PGCGs were 3.81± 2.228 and 10.53±3.432 respectively. Statistical analysis showed a highly significant differences present between them (p<0.01).
Conclusion: The mean number of CD34 positive micro vessels in PGs was significantly more than that of PGCG, but the mean number of vascular surrounding cells non-reactive to α-SMA was significantly less. This can add insight to the clinical behavior and might reflect the differences in pathogenesis of these lesions.
References
2. Reddy V, Saxena S, Saxena S, Reddy M(2012). Reactive hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity: A ten year observational study on north indian population. Clin Exp Dent; 4(3): 36-40.
3. Kamal R, Dahiya P, Puri A(2012). Oral pyogenic granuloma: various concepts of etiopathogenesis. JOMP; 16(1): 79-81.
4. Saghafi I, Amoueian S, Montazer M, Bostan R (2011). Assessment of VEGF, CD-31 and Ki-67 immunohistochemical markers in oral pyogenic granuloma: Acomparison with hemangioma and inflammatory gingivitis. Iran J Basic Med Sci ; 14(2): 185-189.
5. Jafarzadeh H, Sanatkhani M, Mohtasham N (2006). Oral pyogenic granuloma: A review. J Oral Sci; 48(4): 167-175.
6. Gomes Sh R, Shakir VQ, Tavadia J K (2013) .Pyogenic granuloma of the gingival:A misnomer? – A case report and review of literature. J Indian Soc Periodontol; 17(4): 514-519.
7. Sharma A, Prakash Mathur V, Divesh Sardana D(2014). Effective management of a pregnancy tumour using a soft tissue diode laser: a case Report. Laser Ther; 23(4): 279–282.
8. Ramu S, Rodrigues CH (2012). Reactive hyperplastic lesions of the gingiva: A retrospective study of 260 cases. World J Dent; 3(2):126-130.
9. Motamedi MH, Eshghyar N, Jafari SM, Lassemi E, Navi F, Abbas FM, (2007). Peripheral and central giant cell granulomas of the jaws: A demographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 103:39–43.
10. Gold M, Blanchet M, Samayawardhena LA, Bennett J, Maltby S, Pallen CJ, (2010).CD34 Function in intracellular signaling and mucosal inflammatory disease development. AACI; 6(3):15-19.
11. Cherng SH, Young J, Ma H (2008) .Alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). J Am Sci; 4(4): 1545-1003.
12. Damasceno LS , Gonçalves FS, Silva EC, Zenóbio EG, Souza PEA, Rebello MC, et al (2012). Stromal myofibroblasts in focal reactive overgrowths of the gingiva. Braz Oral Res; 26(4):373-377.
13. Rao K B, Malathi N, Narashiman S, Trajan SH (2014) .Evaluation of myofibroblasts by expression of alpha smooth muscle actin: A marker in fibrosis, dysplasia and carcinoma. J Clin Diagn Res; 8(4): 14-17.
14. Amatangelo MD, Bassi DE, Klein-Szanto AJ, Cukierman E(2005). Stroma-derived three- dimensional matrices are necessary and sufficient to promote desmoplastic differentiation of normal fibroblasts. Am J Pathol; 167:475–488.
15. Seyedmajidi1 M, Shafaee SH, Hashemipour G, Bijani A, Ehsani H(2015). Immunohistochemical evaluation of angiogenesis related markers in pyogenic granuloma of gingiva. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 16 (17): 7513-7516.
16. Vasconcelos MG, Alves PM, Vasconcelos RG, et al (2011). Expression of CD34 and CD105 as markers for angiogenesis in oral vascular malformations and pyogenic granulomas. European Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol; 268:1213-1217.
17. Hallikeri K, Acharya S, Koneru A, Trivedi DJ(2015). Evaluation of microvessel density in central and peripheral giant cell granulomas. J Adv Clin Res Insights; 2:20-25.
18. Hinz B(2007). Formation and Function of the Myofibroblast during tissue repair. ‎J Invest Dermatol; 127: 526–537.
19. Epivatianos A, Antoniades D, Zaraboukas TH, Zairi E, Poulopoulos A, Kiziridou A, lordanidiss S(2005). Pyogenic granuloma of the oral cavity: Comparative study of its clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features. Pathol Int; 55: 391-397.
20. Kawachi N (2011). A comparative histological and immunohistochemical study of capillary hemangioma,pyogenic Ggranuloma and cavernous hemangioma in oral region with special reference to vascular proliferation factor. Int J Oral Med Sci; 9(3):241-251.
22. Damasceno LS , Gonçalves FS, Silva EC, Zenóbio EG, Souza PEA, Rebello MC, et al (2012). Stromal myofibroblasts in focal reactive overgrowths of the gingiva. Braz Oral Res; 26(4):373-377.
23. Filioreanu AM, Popescu E, Cotrutz C, Cotrut CE(2009).Immunohistochemical and transmission electron microscopy study regarding myofibroblasts in fibroinflammatory epulis and giant cell peripheral granuloma. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 50(3):363–368.
24. Kujan O, Al-Shawaf AZ, Azzeghaiby S, AlManadille A, Aziz K, Raheel SA(2015). Immunohistochemical comparison of p53, Ki-67, CD68, Vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin in oral peripheral and central giant cell granuloma. J Contemp Dent Pract; 16 (1):20-24.
